Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,724 Points:2,090,905 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2012 10:25:34 AM
Really?
The Joy Of Credit Default Swaps: Why GM's Bondholders Are Praying For Bankruptcy
Use of credit default swaps by Wall Street and the large Corporate banks as was attempted here, amounts to little more than legalized corporate theft. It allows the largest institutions to literally steal all the cash value from the unsecured creditors. That was *never* the intent of the bankruptcy laws, to provide secured debt-holders an avenue to strip a company of its value.
Even the Wall Street Journal thought it was important enough to highlight:
Wall Street Bets on Debt That Doesn't Exist
And there are many more such articles, all well before the bankruptcy-light that was designed to prevent this.
Use of the UAW was never more than a partisan scapegoat to hide what was going on, and ultimately to completely push the costs of Chyrsler and General Motor bankruptcies onto the taxpayers. All while Wall Street and the large institutional Banks walked away with ALL the companies' assets.
Its the exact same thing they did to the housing market.
And its why the country is in the shape, it is now...
|
polarbear2

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:12,118 Points:2,752,160 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 19, 2012 7:01:39 AM
Thanks for the views from Mars.
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,724 Points:2,090,905 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2012 10:12:42 AM
That's real intelligent.
Allow the biggest market investors (big banks and Wall Street) to buy bonds. Allow them to hedge those same bonds with credit default swaps. And when it becomes more profittable for those underlying assets to fail than survive, force the company into bankruptcy - solely for the profit.
My, what an excellent what to steal the company value from the common shareholders, the creditors, and small bond holders that don't have the pockets to buy credit default swaps.
-----
Hey, you know what. I bet we could do the same thing with mortgages, if we could find a way to bundle them into securties large enough to have credit default swaps written against them...
Now, we just have to figure out how to get a large number of mortgages to fail, once we've bundled them and got the defaults written...
They destroyed the mortgage market sector of the U.S. economy, they dstroyed the credit markets, and they almost destroyed the auto manufacturing market. But Wall Street, the big banks, and AIG sure did get themselves bailed-out first!
Didn't they!
And who do you think would have footed the bill for pensions and healthcare, if either were forced into full-fledged bankruptcy?
(HINT: Google MediCare and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation)
[Edited by: Martinman at 8/18/2012 11:19:03 AM EST]
|
polarbear2

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:12,118 Points:2,752,160 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 18, 2012 7:13:26 AM
In a bankruptcy does the union get to the head of the line? No it doesn't
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,724 Points:2,090,905 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2012 1:29:51 PM
Again, explain to me how the bondholders got screwed. It was the bondholders intent all along to try to force bankruptcy, not becasue of some beholden belief in the bankruptcy law, but that they would actually PROFIT as a result of failures by Chrysler or General Motors.
The Joy Of Credit Default Swaps: Why GM's Bondholders Are Praying For Bankruptcy
The one that got 'screwed' are the small bondholders, who got 'screwed' by the large institutional bondholders that also held Credit Default Swaps for GM's preferred debt.
|
Martinman

Champion Author
Mississippi
Posts:14,724 Points:2,090,905 Joined:Sep 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2012 1:14:40 PM
He might be a drinking man, but someone else is on drugs...
First, this is nothing more than a paper loss, based upon the current market price for General Motors stock. Until the stock is sold, any profit/loss is nothing more than a value calculation.
The very brief snippet above, clearly slants the article's intent. For example, it later goes on to state:
"Meanwhile, says McAlinden, it’s worth putting the cost of the bailout in context. The $25.1 billion Treasury may lose has to be weighed against the cost of not bailing out GM and Chrysler in the first place. A study in 2010 by the Center for Automotive Research found that the auto rescue likely saved 1.14 million jobs and saved the government $28.6 billion in lost tax revenue. And those estimates, McAlinden said, are likely conservative."
Second, initial estimates were that the Federal government would lose $44 billion on the bailout, which was later reduced to $30 billion in December 2009.
Tell them the truth, but only some of the truth, and nothing but the truth - that paints the picture you're trying to paint.
Ah, the fine art of deception...
Third, a study by the Center for Automotive Research concluded that a failure of any one of the domestic auto manufacturers would have ultimately cost 2.9 million jobs, push unemployment over 14% (technical definition of a Depression), shut-down the entire North American auto manufacturing sector for at least 18 months, and cost federal, state, and local governments more than $400 BILLION in lost tax revenue and higher costs for social programs.
CAR Research Memorandum: The Impact on the U.S. Economy of a Major Contraction of the Detroit Three Automakers
|
polarbear2

Champion Author
Maine
Posts:12,118 Points:2,752,160 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 17, 2012 10:53:58 AM
fajeff01 What are you drinking man? Obama is the one responsible for the debacles at Chrysler and GM. The bond holders got screwed and the unions got ownership.
|
spiderjay

Champion Author
Little Rock
Posts:4,773 Points:1,282,235 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 7:10:55 PM
wow
|
GatorGuy

Champion Author
Columbia
Posts:2,220 Points:1,203,735 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 4:23:13 PM
keep bidding
|
bluebird1

Champion Author
Toronto
Posts:15,715 Points:3,105,000 Joined:May 2004
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 2:35:46 PM
When the gov't gets involved you know overspending is more than likely.
|
fajeff01

All-Star Author
Atlanta
Posts:649 Points:1,319,755 Joined:Jan 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 2:18:37 PM
It's not Obama's fault the Bush administration and congressional Republicans approved the bailout. Obama - once again - was just left to deal with the mess.
IT IS VERY SAD TO KNOW THAT REPUBLICANS BAIL OUT CORPORATIONS BUT NOT PEOPLE. We're just such Christians in America aren't we?!
You can be sure the bible TEACHES this is NOT want Jesus wanted - "Take from the poor and give to the rich" - RIDICULOUS! Yet, that's STILL what currently campaigning politicians want - "take from the poor and give to the rich."
|
357revo

Champion Author
Pittsburgh
Posts:18,107 Points:2,381,680 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 2:08:33 PM
Had GM and Chrysler gone to Chapter 11 bankruptcy, those companies would not have dumped 100% of their work forces onto unemployment. The companies would have been reorganized, gone leaner in operation, and gotten a new lease on life, without saddling the U.S. taxpayers with billions of dollars in debt.
However, after the first infusion of money [under the Bush administration] didn't produce changes in GM's unionized labor force, Obama took it upon himself to dictate the reorganization. He screwed the Preferred Bondholders, who were supposed to be first in line for payment in the event of a reorganization, forcing them to accept 10 cents on the dollar for their investment. Obama then essentially gave more than half of the assets of the company to the unions, so that they could maintain the plush union contracts and benefits, which many would argue put GM in the financial fix that caused the failure. Obama also forced the closing of a significant portion of dealerships, picking and choosing winners and losers in the process. Some claim that dealerships owned by Democrat contributors were allowed to stay, which Republican-backers lost their businesses.
In the union-dominated reorganization, former DELCO employees were stripped of their health and retirement benefits. So much for the little guy. Obama made sure his union backers got the lion's share of the company, and screwed everybody else.
|
357revo

Champion Author
Pittsburgh
Posts:18,107 Points:2,381,680 Joined:Sep 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 1:46:09 PM
The first stories about GM repaying their loans ahead of time was a Public Relations fib. In actuality, they used money from a second line of credit, also of taxpayer dollars, to "pay off" the first loan. In essence, NO SIGNIFICANT DEBT was paid off. Meanwhile, the government is sitting on shares of GM stock, and the value of that varies as the share values change. That's why the loss estimates are changing. And because GM is pushing losers like the Volt, and because the unions are pretty much running the company, the value of all that government stock is going downhill.
|
tes283

All-Star Author
Tampa
Posts:865 Points:368,850 Joined:Dec 2011
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 1:27:20 PM
If the US dumps the shares it will effect the Stock Market...so no good answer. It is money spent so...time to take a blood bath.
|
dieselfiendSC

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:2,170 Points:843,655 Joined:Nov 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 12:51:31 PM
We will never know the truth from this bunch of liars.
|
wayne1066

Rookie Author
California
Posts:97 Points:434,970 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 12:24:46 PM
Why is this viewed as a short zero sum profit/loss? Consider the long term value of the stock and the dividends a profitable company would pay over decades. Why sell the government stock back? Hold it and earn dividends for decades.
|
TustinDad

Champion Author
Orange County
Posts:4,271 Points:906,865 Joined:Feb 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 12:00:21 PM
hatterasjack wrote: "How much would the price tag have been if those companies had gone belly up and put all those workers on the street."
Much, much higher. But that's a question that's not asked around here. You wouldn't be able to blame POTUS for that, would you?
|
msgt_usa

Champion Author
Virginia
Posts:3,454 Points:929,100 Joined:Sep 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:55:32 AM
suprise...suprise...suprise
|
Samo1961

Champion Author
Los Angeles
Posts:1,880 Points:617,750 Joined:Feb 2011
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:52:56 AM
Typical!!
|
sramroop

Champion Author
Birmingham
Posts:3,302 Points:736,930 Joined:Jul 2010
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:48:32 AM
Higher as usual..
|
JagXKR

Champion Author
British Columbia
Posts:3,139 Points:1,087,530 Joined:Dec 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:47:57 AM
Could be lower or higher means a lot of speculation until the final share is sold. I still think the bailouts were necessary but more stipulations on how they run their organizations should have been demanded.
|
hatterasjack

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:1,286 Points:722,320 Joined:Sep 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:43:47 AM
How much would the price tag have been if those companies had gone belly up and put all those workers on the street.
|
NorthglennBill

Champion Author
Denver
Posts:7,417 Points:1,469,370 Joined:Oct 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:35:55 AM
A drop in the bucket compared to the $billions lost on solar power and trying to compete with the Chinese.
|
tomok

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:32,927 Points:2,342,585 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:35:35 AM
Giving money to a failed company that still cannot get it 'right.' Squandering taxpayer money and Barry should know better. If this much government money is lost, GM should be Forced to produce a product that will sell and people will gladly buy. Copy what the other successful auto companies are doing, it's that easy. Whatever the size or shape of the vehicle, Produce and ‘Drive’ vehicles with high MPG, are very safe, reliable, have a ‘reasonable’ cost and a good ‘value’ for the money. The price of fue
|
wang91554

Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:3,150 Points:1,197,805 Joined:May 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:33:53 AM
if GM's woes are in Europe, go get a European bailout!
|
rhughes1691

Sophomore Author
Seattle
Posts:105 Points:282,410 Joined:Jan 2012
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:32:19 AM
so how come I don't get a free car. 3.3 billion should see new cars for pretty much eveyone with a driving license.
|
rossp

Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:13,449 Points:2,303,875 Joined:Apr 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:31:13 AM
So Obama did the auto industry bailout? Oops, that was Bush II. Looks like the Repidiots are even willing to blame Obama for the Spanish Inquisition as well as the fall of Adam.
I'm not saying Obama is without faults. But TRY to do a better job of fact checking that Fox and Friends or Faux "News."
[Edited by: rossp at 8/16/2012 12:33:30 PM EST]
|
Chitowner

Champion Author
Omaha
Posts:4,253 Points:1,128,965 Joined:Jul 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:30:36 AM
cut the pensions and move on
|
waterwerks

Veteran Author
New Mexico
Posts:349 Points:185,930 Joined:Mar 2012
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:29:32 AM
Ahh...Government Motors...they will just keep selling cars and making subprime auto loans to folks that should be driving a Kia and not a Cadillac!
[Edited by: waterwerks at 8/16/2012 12:30:04 PM EST]
|
svspyda

Champion Author
San Jose
Posts:1,663 Points:337,910 Joined:May 2012
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:25:48 AM
ok
|
NanookAK

Champion Author
Anchorage
Posts:7,229 Points:1,437,015 Joined:Nov 2007
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:24:31 AM
Considering the lies that Obama tells and his habit of giving away our money to companies that ultimately go bankrupt, there will be no limit until November.
|
kuma2000

Champion Author
Honolulu
Posts:3,203 Points:670,150 Joined:Jun 2011
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:24:18 AM
and at whose cost?
|
leemun

Champion Author
Utah
Posts:5,513 Points:1,036,125 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:23:40 AM
Postponing the inevitable at huge costs to the taxpayer. We should have had Bain on the job to either turn it around or close it down.
|
mickealo

Champion Author
Spokane
Posts:6,142 Points:2,140,435 Joined:Oct 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:21:55 AM
don't understand these bail out in the first place if I had a busness and was about to go under and I asked uncle sam for help it would never happen so why is it that the big geys get help that ends up costing me more in taxes that can cause my busness to fail because of over taxation sounds like a two edged knife in the backs of small busness
|
IMLURCH

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:2,169 Points:1,100,255 Joined:Mar 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:21:17 AM
With the governments track record on bailouts it will go higher.
|
rbrowdersr

Champion Author
Detroit
Posts:5,711 Points:1,816,160 Joined:Aug 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:20:00 AM
Election year rhetoric.
|
LuckyD43

Champion Author
Long Island
Posts:31,975 Points:2,165,145 Joined:Apr 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:18:48 AM
Although it may not have been a popular decision, consider how many jobs, homes and lives the bailout saved. You just can't put a pricetag on something like that.
|
skybiker

Champion Author
South Carolina
Posts:7,277 Points:1,556,390 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:18:46 AM
GM is headed for bankruptcy again.....
|
Boinkit

Champion Author
Twin Cities
Posts:20,209 Points:3,860,425 Joined:Sep 2001
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:17:40 AM
@phinsup67
Well as a "former" Saturn employee, who lost my job, my house and family, I guess you're right.
"there is no price to be put on that".
Thanks Mr. Obama. Fooled me once with your "hope and change". Won't fool me this time.
|
KarateDude

Champion Author
Cincinnati
Posts:2,486 Points:833,840 Joined:Mar 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:16:38 AM
What is the ROI ???
|
feldagast

All-Star Author
Toledo
Posts:897 Points:104,335 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:15:32 AM
BOHICA
|
ciimike

Champion Author
Nevada
Posts:4,638 Points:1,061,310 Joined:Aug 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:15:28 AM
Definitely not one of the US's best bail-outs.
|
gasman50

Champion Author
Portland
Posts:8,829 Points:2,406,560 Joined:Nov 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:14:52 AM
Time will tell.........
|
19sheldon43

Champion Author
Los Angeles
Posts:3,979 Points:843,010 Joined:Jul 2009
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:13:40 AM
Funny I personally don't feel any poorer for it. I still get the same amount on my SS check and I don't pay any more in taxes. So I gess my question is would I get more money if we did't lose this $25.1 billion?
|
phinsup67

Champion Author
North Carolina
Posts:5,365 Points:1,179,130 Joined:Oct 2005
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:12:11 AM
I've always heard you have to spend money to make money. If we saved jobs, families, homes and dignity of thousands there is no price to be put on that.
|
cheap59

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:4,240 Points:960,020 Joined:May 2010
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:12:09 AM
Old post!
|
MightyDude

Champion Author
Minnesota
Posts:10,335 Points:2,645,070 Joined:Mar 2003
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:11:54 AM
not in agreement but was probably the lessor of the evils
|
DblChek

Champion Author
San Antonio
Posts:2,341 Points:613,390 Joined:Jul 2008
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:10:36 AM
Don't know much about it. I sold my car to pay employment taxes.
|
uptherefiners

Champion Author
Chicago
Posts:5,048 Points:1,002,000 Joined:Jun 2006
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:07:29 AM
wrong crapulent, bailout began in January 2009
|
hper

Sophomore Author
Detroit
Posts:168 Points:275,810 Joined:Feb 2012
|
Message Posted: Aug 16, 2012 11:06:12 AM
My simple way of looking at it is...as long as the wasted money flows from one person/business to another, it is not a total loss. It does keep the economy moving. I know..not a good answer but...
|